The performance review provides an opportunity to develop goals for the coming year and to discuss career advancement issues to ensure the employee's development and
growth.
In addition to an annual review, a mid-year review can help to partially review the performance half way through and realign the efforts of employees, if needed, to achieve
the set goals and objectives. It can help to ensure the employees are able to achieve the desired performance that was planned, to detect and handle performance issues
early on, and to keep motivation high.
The mid-year performance review can be seen as a checkpoint in the full performance period, where formal assessment of the employee performance is done (similar to year-end
review), but instead of planning new goals and objectives for the next period, here employee efforts, resources, and support activities are planned to ensure the current
objectives are met.
Performance review involves the objective and subjective consideration of how to measure and evaluate employee performance results. Objective indicators of performance can include measures such as dollar volume of sales, profitability or amount of product produced.
Subjective indicators typically involve collecting information about employees' accomplishments and assessing the impact of these contributions.
A measurement scale (in {CLIENT}'S case, a four-point rating scale starting from "does not meet expectations to exceeds expectations") is used to capture employee performance results. The rating scale provides a sufficient number of rating levels to differentiate performance among employees.
Evaluating performance includes consideration of the full array of factors associated with employee performance success. These address competencies possessed by the employee as they are related to the technical and behavioral requirements of the role in question.
In addition, employee performance is evaluated based on the level of achievement of the goals set during the planning process. Clear goals are key in performance management because they provide managers with a way to measure performance that is objective and clear. Well set and clear goals can objectively be evaluated on whether or not the goal has been reached. Poorly set goals are not clear and can’t necessarily tell what it will look like once the goal has been achieved. The result is frustration and lack of effectiveness.
The Managers should focus on developing employee performance in areas that are rated low and identify the root causes of the performance problems and issues. After identification of performance problems, the manager should put in place an improvement plan and identify resources, support etc. to ensure the employee is able to achieve their goals and objectives by the end of the performance period.
Rating Category | Definition |
---|---|
Superior | Sets an excellent example to others in all aspects of work and achievement. Outstanding performance that results in exceptional accomplishments with significant contributions to goals of the Organization, Department, and/or Senior Management area. |
Strong Performer | Quality and quantity of work is routinely per expectations. Performance reflects high degree of initiative and commitment to excellence. All job requirements are met, goals and objectives are achieved per standards. |
Performer | Employee meets performance expectations. Employee demonstrates understanding of all job functions and expected standards. |
Partially Meets Expectations | Employee missed some targeted metrics (e.g. deadlines, quality, commitments). Employee requires close supervision and does not consistently demonstrate the ability to perform job functions at expected level of proficiency. Overall objectives are not achieved. |
Does Not Meet Expectations | Employee fails to meet expectations. Performance is well below the job requirements. |